After reading Andrew Sullivan's concern over the selection of Ratzinger, or shall I say Benedict XVI, I can only say that I'm more optimistic than he is. Popes like Presidents (or just about everything else, for that matter) don't please everyone, but to hold such ominous portents of the future only hours after the new Pope is announced seems a little extreme. Yes, Andrew's concerns for the state of the voice of reformers are noted. But again, let's see what happens.
For me, the Creed is what guides me. Popes, sadly and gloriously, come and go. Benedict XVI seems to be very solid in his beliefs and in his position on what the Church should be, and I think that's a good thing. He is, after all, supposed to be, "The Rock."
I do see him as more of a steadying, transitional pick. Following PJPII is not the most enviable task, and though he is, at first glance, much less charismatic than his predecessor, I will abide by the decision and get to know him better.
I will also obey his first request, and that is to pray for him....
UPDATE: Hugh Hewitt notes that Benedict XVI will, in all likelihood have quite a bit to say about his successor since 48 of the 64 cardinal-electors are older than 74. Perhaps his influence will be more wide-reaching than merely a trasitional figure.
UPDATE: Saw this coming. Matt's update is beneath him. But at least he calls a cheapshot for what it is; it's too bad he seems to take such delight in it. And the 'Comments' section is even worse. I trust that if Matt has ever been intoxicated in his life, it's safe for us to brand him a drunk?
